@EuroMasochismo Ed è questa la scusa che vogliono usare per il cosiddetto "aborto post-nascita": https://t.co/BDddqmz5f2
@MyronAnag Παρεμπιπτόντως, πριν 7.5 χρόνια έγινε χαμός με τούτο δω το άρθρο https://t.co/fMPuOZeYxo απειλές, άρθρα στον τύπο κλπ, αλλά και ειδικό τεύχος του JMEthics το 13 με 31 άρθρα για την βρεφοκτονία αν και πώς διαφέρει από την έκτρωση.
@daphnenews Όσο το καταλαβαίνω, η αυτονομία ως πλαίσιο λύνει ένα πρόβλημα, αλλά μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε διαισθητικά παράδοξα. Όπως πχ ότι αν επιτρέπεται η άμβλωση, πρέπει να επιτρέπεται η θανάτωση νεογέννητων. https://t.co/fMPuOZeYxo
@MrsDaftPrawn @ARPL @realchabski @realDonaldTrump Article written in 2013 in Journal of Medical Ethics which states the term after birth abortion is correct term and not infincide. https://t.co/iF0RifN3jC
@monicacharley32 @atomzollo @ACLU "Viability" is unknown unless the baby is born and given care. Already some Pro-Choice advocates are extending "viability" to after birth: https://t.co/D2SPdy3Yr1
@FouldsIain @brianlilley @JustinTrudeau Actually, some people HAVE suggested that a woman should have the "right" to eliminate a one year old: https://t.co/4Mh54WQej3
@StopIllatosut @UNBORNness @ChristianRep @CiPolitics OMG - they abolish the difference between fetus and newborn and consider it justified to kill disabled babies for economic reasons https://t.co/oPw7jXHKB8
@judyho14 @charliekirk11 But there are actually people advocating elective infanticide. The following is a legitimate medical journal article written by two academics at Oxford and the University of Ghent: https://t.co/VpBg7LZyKX
The INSANITY is speeding up.... The return to PURE PAGANISM.... "JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS" MAYBE AN OXYMORON?? 🤔😡😠😡😠 "...we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would... https://t.co/dp9n
RT @TruthAgape: This is in the Journal of Medical Ethics: "the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the…
This is in the Journal of Medical Ethics: "the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn." What will stop them from concluding anyone with "defects" isn't a person?
A logical extension of every abortion argument out there...and one of the most disgusting things I've ever read. https://t.co/bnLNtHcLed
@Abulinixish @justagirl_75 @Ptcwang @Sniffy2 @xan_desanctis @DavidAFrench And Some of us are more progressive and believe in a women's right to chose. Always. https://t.co/HsODdKnhsw
So, apparently my horror novels are true crime ..... https://t.co/KxWDkU9E4Z
@SM0352 @Photopam45 @APSouthRegion There is such a debate. It is really no different than allowing 3rd trimester abortions. https://t.co/pblbRc4FKV
But I had it on good authority that nobody supports infanticide! 😱 #DemDebate
https://t.co/sQkPXfLJ2T Infanticide. You have a Medical Ethics journal publishing an article literally advocating for Infanticide. The murder of the most vulnerable among us, tolerated, accepted, even celebrated. That is what these monsters are advocati
Miren la siguiente estación del progreso. Aborto post-natal. Defendido en un paper de manera no irónica https://t.co/S1C0hfqSvs
@WargSneezes It's also called post-natal abortion, after-birth abortion, etc. BECAUSE it refers to the baby's life and not the pregnancy. https://t.co/8cGckwgTP2 "Abortion legally refers only to a fetus/embryo" You're giving me the legal definition, we're
@wendyweb47 @PattersonPaul It’s a term used to describe a particular situation wrt ethics. https://t.co/eA3eblQdLw
@ArmouredSkeptic @CarnalConsrvatv https://t.co/4RhIBkc7EY journal of ethics in medicine: , the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the ne
@StraightshotT @theoztrucker @Detracter the theory is, until a newborn develops a personality, it is not yet a proper person..... this is Nazi style Eugenics shit... https://t.co/YIVYlDkPPP
The Left gets more and more honest about what they want. https://t.co/4aYD9xLHEU
This may be old news for some of you, but what the actual hell? https://t.co/6wjgIuYAQY
@LaniakeanWitch https://t.co/Nbu6EfOcQP Tenez, un excellent article scientifique qui explique en quoi les arguments en faveur de l'avortement sont utilisable pour légitimer l'infanticide, alors dites moi, êtes vous aussi pro-infanticide ou êtes vous hypoc
RT @RRomanovitch: @alicelibre @brunop2017 Les progressistes préparent déjà le terrain pour l'avortement post-natal, cf. cet article paru da…
@alicelibre @brunop2017 Les progressistes préparent déjà le terrain pour l'avortement post-natal, cf. cet article paru dans le «journal of medical ethics» en 2011. https://t.co/up0FpSmGzs
@conservmillen Read this and tell me how abortionists aren’t monsters. https://t.co/3JNFrf35Xi
This is the main conclusion: "the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn." #ProLife #RoeVWade #Abortion https://t.co/XLSdfCnejU
"If a potential person, like a fetus and a newborn, does not become an actual person, like you and us, then there is neither an actual nor a future person who can be harmed, which means that there is no harm at all." #ProLife https://t.co/XLSdfCnejU
"Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’." #ProLife https://t.co/XLSdfCnejU
"...we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be." #ProLife #RoeVWade #Abortion @March_for_Life @nrlc https://t.co/XLSdfCnejU
"...to bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole...when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible." #ProLife http
"...about 1700 infants were born with Down's syndrome without parents being aware of it before birth. Once these children are born, there is no choice for the parents but to keep the child..." #ProLife https://t.co/XLSdfCnejU
So, I read this study in full this morning - and I have to say I'm a bit horrified. Read it yourself - I have some of the most interesting quotes coming. #ProLife https://t.co/XLSdfCnejU
After birth abortion aka infanticide logic. Source: https://t.co/1BPRd3ntUb https://t.co/9kD1oHLDOt
@rodrigobackess https://t.co/UBdTVCjhji Aqui o link pro artigo, boa sorte se tiver estômago
@aguedescartoon @aguedescartoon Já pensou se a moda pega? "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" https://t.co/3iJx5j3QoV
@GynAndTonic @March_for_Life Why are you lying about this? https://t.co/5zUo1egygn
@LostUrquhart @itaintwhiteboy @NotCarKing ''the moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.'' https://t.co/4RhIBkc7EY
RT @_Ryan_Smyth_: @GodlessWomanOne @Docs4GunControl @BillBlair @JustinTrudeau Doctors? Have ethics? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🌎💯🥓 https://t.co/iHOkPSNIl…
RT @Ferallist: There’s a reason why abortion advocates say a baby is not a “person”. It’s not the reason you might think. It’s worse. https…
@ceydyec https://t.co/mSWRuXM9VK Burda. Ulaşamıyosan eve gidince atarım
RT @lawyer4laws: ** How many Democrats decided 3rd Term, Abortion up to birth or even after birth is okay. Journal of Medical Ethics wrote…
** How many Democrats decided 3rd Term, Abortion up to birth or even after birth is okay. Journal of Medical Ethics wrote how babies are not useful to society until after toddler stage . . they're unaware and therefore can be eliminated. https://t.co/W6lH
RT @Ferallist: @conservmillen Their logic is even more frightening than their illogic. https://t.co/PVrhqCOZsm
There’s a reason why abortion advocates say a baby is not a “person”. It’s not the reason you might think. It’s worse. https://t.co/PVrhqCOZsm
@conservmillen Their logic is even more frightening than their illogic. https://t.co/PVrhqCOZsm
@FreddySpaghett5 @AliEldrazi @Bigmclrghuge1 Sorry, it was called "after-birth abortion" https://t.co/zVlPRiY1iu I'm not disagreeing with you. I was simply stating that it was something I heard about. Why are you so upset with me? Calm down haha
@IdiMiNaProfil @cipolla12 @AktivnoGlup https://t.co/TPsOQ1YPBf. Evo ti link prema onom članku koji se zove: "After-birth abortion: why should baby live". Izašao u "Jornal of Medical ethics". Strahota.
@EdoardoComO Tecnicamente isso já existe desde Esparta, mas tem artigo de 2012 já chamando falando disso https://t.co/O3BC1hvuhw
RT @jaythenerdkid: are you asking me what I would have done if my parents would have committed infanticide, because if so, a) why would you…
are you asking me what I would have done if my parents would have committed infanticide, because if so, a) why would you (or anyone) ask me that, and b) what on god's rapidly and unsustainably warming earth does that have to do with abortion, which is not
@balleyne @gail_gw @ElizabethMay @CanadianGreens One COULD make the argument that a woman should be allowed to euthanize newborns in order to prevent more gruesome and painful deaths. For some #ProChoice people, "after birth abortion" will become the next
@AtYouNotWithYou @MmmTea_____ @x_lilys @ZubyMusic @IanJamesKing_ A newborn doesn't have emotions, feelings or cognitive awareness, and cannot survive without outside actions. Should it be legal to "abort" a newborn, too? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@jaythenerdkid If you had been "aborted" shortly AFTER birth, would you have remembered? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@PanamStyle @audrawilliams @ElizabethMay @CanadianGreens Many "pro choice" folks are starting to admit that abortion is a form of killing. https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@orpearl @nurse_nomad @annsciart @ElizabethMay @CanadianGreens You might also want to read this article from the British Medical Journal: https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@gail_gw @balleyne @ElizabethMay @CanadianGreens Actually, some ARE arguing for legalizing "abortion" AFTER birth: https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@YeeMikePaterson @BretWeinstein @danarel How post birth? Again, we're talking about limits you pretend aren't needed. They are. https://t.co/GhOHsNkuxh
@Afrimerican2 @benleisy @Timcast It's already there https://t.co/jeXAkWuMkN After-birth abortion: why should the baby ...
If pro-lifers want to play hardball, we should play hardball right back. Time for a blue state to implement this https://t.co/n2KceyOGFt
@YeeMikePaterson @BretWeinstein @danarel You just woke up in a different world. Post birth abortion is not a decision that 'no one' would make so the timeframe of "post birth" is the only question. https://t.co/IUlX3up3Wu
@Alyssa_Milano So you're saying that "infanticide" is now "after birth abortion" too? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@CStamper_ It's not "infanticide" anymore, it's "after birth abortion" https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@jameelajamil What if a woman "doesn't want and isn't read for" the baby AFTER it's been born? Should she be allowed to have it "put down"??? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@Christian_Joho @BernieSanders @natrene_ Why shouldn't a woman be able to obtain an "after birth abortion"??? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@DysphoricPrisma @ElectriXite @BernieSanders @huhohthatscool If 3rd trimester "partial birth" abortions are not banned or at least restricted, I worry that THIS may happen in the future 👇👇 https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@RebeccaCNReid @ZubyMusic What if a woman's mind changes AFTER the baby is born? Should she (or society) be burdened with a baby that is no longer wanted? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@StoriesofSam @JulioAPCR @Das_Audi @ZubyMusic If a woman WANTS to give birth to a child, but doesn't want it anymore, should they be allowed to have it "put down"? Should society be expected to take care of all children? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@IanJamesKing_ @ZubyMusic Some of the reasons for 3rd trimester abortion (rape, incest, poverty, severe disability, change of mind) can be used to "justify" infanticide, too. 😢 https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@clairlemon @Manning4USCong All arguments supporting "fetuses are not children" also support "new borns are not humans" see the medical ethics paper advocating killing infants: https://t.co/jeXAkWuMkN After-birth abortion: why should the baby ...
@mimiabuisnaineh @ryanfred @LilaGraceRose @lsarsour Actually, some doctors ARE making the argument for infanticide, saying that it should be treated no differently than having an unwanted dog "put down". https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@mimiabuisnaineh @LilaGraceRose @lsarsour In the 3rd trimester a fetus CAN be safely delivered via cesarean section. https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
@tlainla @jameelajamil If having a poor mother in need of social services is "justification" for abortion...is it also "justification" for having a baby "put down" AFTER it's been born? https://t.co/qTR54z0xEm
RT @wickedgame_WTF: @CountryJazz4 Full list of articles from Medical Ethics that are free to read. https://t.co/xGsUsG2Zp9 During POLAR V…
@CountryJazz4 Full list of articles from Medical Ethics that are free to read. https://t.co/xGsUsG2Zp9 During POLAR VORTEX in Michigan, did some research 🤔 FAITH in God prevails CONCLUSION abortion - pre-birth or post is murder.
@DrPardi @SophiaCannon @free2expressvus @girlsreallyrule famous one is https://t.co/axbkEDPyuU . Most reaction was negative but I think we are crazy enough to go there because as a society we have no *logical* counter to the reasoning of e.g. https://t.co
@ericstirr @liberal_party A 1 year old dog has a higher IQ level than a newborn. Does a baby born premature have rights? Why should a woman be allowed2terminate an 8 mo old fetus, but NOT a 1 wk old newborn delivered 2 months prematurely? https://t.co/4Mh5
@JSibley99 @rolandfinn @Pro_Maize @SarahKSilverman @Timcast In this article, the argument is made that a newborn and fetus are not considered persons ...yet. https://t.co/SEPDpE1GlE
@skyeerie @RebornUnicorn1 @kapaibro @kao469 @RVAwonk @icecreamkohn2 @davequast @NYCAntifa Medical Ethics Journal....is this lies too?https://t.co/ZoTbTWWjQO
RT @ebleas: Is the "goal" of an abortion to simply rid the mother of the unwanted fetus (and the fetus must therefore unfortunately die), o…
Is the "goal" of an abortion to simply rid the mother of the unwanted fetus (and the fetus must therefore unfortunately die), or to exterminate the life within her? After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/5MbLbuvS0G #AbortionIsMurder