RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
Het jaagt je toch angst aan dat mensen zo over een mensenleven kunnen beslissen. 😳
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
The left. https://t.co/AVbRVnSTzx
Kijk, dat schiet op! Op naar de ouderen... #eenbeetjelogischnadenken #wegmetonrendabelen
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
If God hasn't spoken, no one can argue. But He has. And *all humanity* will give an account in light of His Truth.
ok... het kan altijd érger
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
De horror van een goddeloze samenleving, de 'brave new world' is er bijna... hoewel ik hoop dat niet gelovigen hier ook (nog?) van schrikken. https://t.co/Htu9kJfa1a "the authors argue that killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where a
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @cees_dekker: Welkom in de seculiere wereld anno 2019 https://t.co/A1QjTVwMdh
RT @RealShowstopper: holyshit... ipv dat ze concluderen dat abortus onterecht zo vanzelfsprekend wordt gevonden concluderen ze dat de gebor…
RT @jjmann17: Every time i do politics on twitters, it's a bad idea. And then something happens that i cannot not comment on! Horrifyin…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
holyshit... ipv dat ze concluderen dat abortus onterecht zo vanzelfsprekend wordt gevonden concluderen ze dat de geboren baby ook best kan worden gedood.... ronduit bizar
Every time i do politics on twitters, it's a bad idea. And then something happens that i cannot not comment on! Horrifying.
I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of Medical Ethics https://t.co/EjekhgRDN6
After-birth abortus is niets anders dan moord op een pas geboren kindje.
😢
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
This is sick and evil. "we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be" I'm reading Exodus 1-2. Our culture is creating Satanic Pharoahs. We are not post-Christian, but neo-Egyptian. http
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @cees_dekker: Welkom in de seculiere wereld anno 2019 https://t.co/A1QjTVwMdh
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
"Conclusion: If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) (...) are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the fetus is healthy (...) then the same reasons (...) justify the killing of a newborn". Espeluznante. https://t.c
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @RvBinsbergen: ‘Foetus is potentieel persoon. Dat geldt ook voor net geboren baby. Waarom zou je die niet mogen doden?’, vragen twee Aus…
If you’ve ever questioned the #TotalDepravity of man see the article linked in the original tweet... #PureWickedness #AbjectEvil #ChildSacrifice #AbortionIsMurder
RT @cees_dekker: Welkom in de seculiere wereld anno 2019 https://t.co/A1QjTVwMdh
RT @bandmanakers: Potential personhood mortally irrelevant? No moral status as actual persons? I think someone could say "we told you so"…
Hier wordt dus serieus overnagedacht in onze wereld. Wat mij betreft houdt het christendom deze logica nog eens 2000 jaar tegen. Mensen zijn inherent waardevol en mogen nooit zomaar worden omgebracht of geaborteerd.
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
Dla ludzi o mocnych nerwach
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @bandmanakers: Potential personhood mortally irrelevant? No moral status as actual persons? I think someone could say "we told you so"…
Welkom in de seculiere wereld anno 2019
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @bandmanakers: Potential personhood mortally irrelevant? No moral status as actual persons? I think someone could say "we told you so"…
Potential personhood mortally irrelevant? No moral status as actual persons? I think someone could say "we told you so". This is abominable. Link: https://t.co/FzT0JneBfD https://t.co/dZQ2Y2jTao
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
This is absolutely reprehensible, but at least they’re honest enough to conclude that the logical end of the abortionist philosophy is that you can kill whoever you want for whatever reason you want. https://t.co/N9GgfOdhf0
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
Who are these monsters?!?! 😲 Anyone who believes this should be locked up in a mental institution for life. Anyone who actually does it should get the electric chair.
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
Schuivende ethiek: Als de pasgeboren baby niet bevalt, dan filosoferen deze ethici zo dat het doden van die baby zou kunnen worden gezien als een late abortus. Ze labelen de baby als in potentie een mens, maar nu nog niet. Scheelt vlgs hen ook veel kosten.
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
Lezenswaardig artikel en daardoor een kijkje in de "ethische gedachtegang" van de post-moderne, verlichte mens. #endabortionnow https://t.co/cM0aA1ShtB
"We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her. "
"Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’."
"The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual."
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
This is horrific
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
‘Foetus is potentieel persoon. Dat geldt ook voor net geboren baby. Waarom zou je die niet mogen doden?’, vragen twee Australische ethici zich af. https://t.co/N5rb50IYg4
Let this sink in: medical ethicists arguing for the post-delivery killing of babies b/c, according to the authors, they are not 'actual persons' but only 'potential persons'.
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter Singer van Princeton.
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.” https://t.c
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
"Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled." Christianity banished this 'logic' for 2000 years. But such is the recent argument of two respected Australian academics. https
@davidould This is from the BMJ.. if people dont think there are drs out there that will do up to birth abortions they are not looking at all the evidence. https://t.co/DO7pgATnXy
@isapmarquez @Miguel__Lorente @el_pais @UGR_Igualdad @CanalUGR Aborto después de nacer: ¿por qué debería vivir el bebé? https://t.co/oAWVLkjrOw
Democrat future-think (near future) for defending Post-Bith Abortion... “a potential person, ... a newborn, does not become an actual person... then there is neither an actual nor a future person who can be harmed, which means that there is no harm at all”